« Back to Results

Macroeconomic Implications of Debt Contracts

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 6, 2019 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Atlanta Marriott Marquis, Marquis Ballroom A
Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: Yueran Ma, University of Chicago

Household Debt Revaluation and the Real Economy: Evidence from a Foreign Currency Debt Crisis

Emil Verner
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

This paper examines how an increase in household debt affects the local economy using a foreign currency debt crisis in Hungary as a natural experiment. We construct shocks to local household debt burdens by exploiting spatial variation in households’ exposure to foreign currency debt during the large (over 30%) and unexpected depreciation of the Hungarian forint in late 2008. We first show that a shock to local household debt leads to a rise in default rates and a persistent decline in local durable and non-durable consumption. Next, we find that regions with greater exposure to foreign currency debt experience a persistent increase in local unemployment. Firm-level census data reveal that employment losses are driven by firms dependent on local demand. Exposed areas see a modest decline in wages, but no adjustment through reallocation toward exporting firms or migration. In addition to the direct effect of higher debt, we find evidence of local spillovers. Regional exposure to foreign currency debt predicts a decline in house prices and an increase in the probability of default for households with only domestic currency debt. Our results are consistent with demand and pecuniary externalities of household foreign currency debt financing.

Mortgage Design and Housing Market

Adam Guren
,
Boston University
Arvind Krishnamurthy
,
Stanford University
Timothy James McQuade
,
Stanford University

Abstract

How can mortgages be redesigned to reduce housing market volatility, consumption volatility, and default? How does mortgage design interact with monetary policy? We answer these questions using a quantitative equilibrium life cycle model with aggregate shocks, long-term mortgages, and an equilibrium housing market, focusing on designs that index payments to monetary policy. Designs that raise mortgage payments in booms and lower them in recessions do better than designs with fixed mortgage payments. The welfare benefits are quantitatively substantial: ARMs improve household welfare relative to FRMs by the equivalent of 0.83 percent of annual consumption under a monetary regime in which the central bank lowers real interest rates in a bust. Among designs that reduce payments in a bust, we show that those that front-load the payment reductions and concentrate them in recessions outperform designs that spread payment reductions over the life of the mortgage. Front-loading alleviates household liquidity constraints in states where they are most binding, reducing default and stimulating housing demand by new homeowners. To isolate this channel, we compare an FRM with a built-in option to be converted to an ARM with an FRM with an option to be refinanced at the prevailing FRM rate. Under these two contracts, the present value of a lender’s loan falls by roughly an equal amount, as these contracts primarily differ in the timing of expected repayments. The FRM that can be converted to an ARM, which front loads payment reductions, improves household welfare by four times as much.

Anatomy of Corporate Borrowing Constraints

Chen Lian
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Yueran Ma
,
University of Chicago

Abstract

Macro-finance analyses commonly link firms’ borrowing constraints to the liquidation value of physical collateral. For US non-financial firms, we show that 20% of debt by value is collateralized by physical assets (“asset-based lending” in creditor parlance), whereas 80% is based predominantly on cash flows from firms’ operations (“cash flow-based lending”). A standard borrowing constraint restricts total debt as a function of cash flows measured using operating earnings (“earnings-based borrowing constraints”). These features shape firm outcomes on the margin: first, cash flows in the form of operating earnings can directly relax borrowing constraints; second, firms are less vulnerable to collateral damage from asset price declines, and fire sale amplifications may be mitigated.

Firm Debt Covenants and the Macroeconomy

Daniel Greenwald
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

Interest coverage covenants, which set a minimum ratio of earnings to interest payments, are among the most popular provisions in firm debt contracts. For affected firms, the amount of additional debt that can be issued without violating these covenants is highly sensitive to interest rates. At the macroeconomic level, these covenants therefore provide a potential source of transmission from interest rates into firm borrowing and investment. This paper investigates this transmission channel empirically, and develops a macroeconomic framework to characterize its properties in general equilibrium. Importantly, most firms that have interest coverage covenants also face a maximum on the ratio of debt to earnings. Simultaneously imposing these limits implies a novel source of state-dependence: when interest rates are high, interest coverage limits are tighter, amplifying the influence of interest rate changes and monetary policy, while when rates are low, debt-to-earnings covenants dominate and transmission is weaker.
Discussant(s)
Jesse Schreger
,
Columbia University
Tim Landvoigt
,
University of Pennsylvania
Simon Gilchrist
,
New York University
Douglas Diamond
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy
  • G0 - General