American Economic Journal:
Microeconomics
ISSN 1945-7669 (Print) | ISSN 1945-7685 (Online)
Intermediation Reduces Punishment (and Reward)
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics
vol. 3,
no. 4, November 2011
(pp. 77–106)
Abstract
This paper shows moral decision making is not well predicted by the overall fairness of an act but rather by the fairness of the consequences that follow directly. In laboratory experiments, third-party punishment for keeping money from a poorer player decreases when an intermediary actor is included in the transaction. This is true for completely passive intermediaries, even though intermediation decreases the payout of the poorest player and hurts equity, and because intermediation distances the transgressor from the outcome. A separate study shows rewards of charitable giving decrease when the saliency of an intermediary is increased. (JEL A13, D63, D64)Citation
Coffman, Lucas C. 2011. "Intermediation Reduces Punishment (and Reward)." American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3 (4): 77–106. DOI: 10.1257/mic.3.4.77Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- A13 Relation of Economics to Social Values
- D63 Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- D64 Altruism
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment