This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Perspectives
  4. Winter 1992
  5. Correspondence

Journal of Economic Perspectives

ISSN 0895-3309 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7965 (Online)

Correspondence

  • Rendigs Fels
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 6, no. 1, Winter 1992
(pp. 201–210)
Download Full Text PDF
(Complimentary)

Abstract

Correspondence and response regarding: An Update on Leontief's Complaint [Academic Economics] [Theory versus Empiricism in Academic Economics: Update and Comparison]. What We Do with Our Heroes [Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective]. Response [Is Probability Theory Relevant for Uncertainty? A Post Keynesian Perspective]. Why Monopsony Is Different [The Benefits of Asymmetric Markets].

Citation

Fels, Rendigs. 1992. "Correspondence." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (1): 201–210. DOI: 10.1257/jep.6.1.201

JEL Classification

  • A11 Role of Economics; Role of Economists
  • B41 Economic Methodology
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment